Farming Video | Why One Missed Pass Cost Half a Wheat Crop

18 May 253m 1s

Lee Lubbers of Gregory, South Dakota, shares a powerful real-world example of why every step in a systems-based farming approach matters. During winter wheat harvest, Lee intentionally skipped a fungicide application in the corners of a field as a test. The result? A dramatic yield drop—far worse than the expected 10–20 bushels—likely cutting yields in half. He highlights how missing even one step in an otherwise high-performing system can result in major losses, especially as farmers push for higher yields. The skipped pass led to poor standability, downed wheat, and a crop in those spots that simply won’t pay the bills. Lee drives home the value of consistency and attention to detail, especially when conditions turn challenging.

00:00:00 Hey everybody, it's Lee Luber from Gregory South Dakota with extreme Ag and today I'm gonna show you the value of the systems approach that we all practice 00:00:09 and preach about in extreme ag and what happens when you miss a step. So this is gonna be interesting. 00:00:17 Here are our standing in the wheat field. Uh, we're partway through winter wheat harvest and, uh, grinding away at it. 00:00:23 In this field we have four power poles that we have to go around and normally we back in 00:00:28 and get the corners everything. And Rich was, uh, spraying vis ace at head scab time and I said, just go around it. 00:00:35 I said, let's leave it as experiment. Who knows? Maybe we'll see 10 or 20 bushels different. Well, we're seeing a lot more than that 00:00:43 and it's one step that we missed, but we missed it on purpose. But it shows the value of a systems approach. 00:00:51 You can see standability is terrible. It's kinking over falling over a lot of heads, uh, just very little weed in it. 00:00:59 Uh, instead of 10 or 20 bush hole, we expect it to be half. We're gonna have to cut it on the ground. 00:01:05 Uh, when we cut it, it'll be interesting to see what the difference is in the yield monitors, but we're anticipating probably cutting the crop in 50% 00:01:14 and you come out where you start getting coverage and it changes in a hurry. And this is not spectacular ground. 00:01:22 This ground does well for us, but a lot of our wheat, we're running a lot of one twenties, one thirties. 00:01:27 We've even ran higher in fields. But this, that field is a pretty average representation for wheat crop this year. 00:01:34 It's a very good wheat crop here in South Central, South Dakota. And look where we didn't miss the step 00:01:40 night and day difference. You go, Hey, there's a crop that's crap. It's one step we missed on purpose 00:01:50 and wow, we were anticipating maybe 10 to 20 bushel an acre reduction, more like 50%, and it could even be worse. 00:01:58 So huge difference. We go from a bumper crop in our area to one that's not gonna pay the bills in those corners. 00:02:07 So I'm glad we did it. We learned a lot. And uh, it just shows the value that you don't wanna miss a step as you're pushing 00:02:14 for higher yields, trying to do better. As you push higher, you also amplify potential negatives. That's where you miss a step. 00:02:22 It can get rather costly in a hurry. So we learned a lot by doing that. But a huge difference that made 00:02:33 if we were in doubt and wondering, Hey, I wonder if this pass pays. Oh yeah. And we actually were getting dry when it happened. 00:02:41 Uh, we were getting some dues, but uh, the rains have really cut back since then. So in a really wet year, wet period, right then, 00:02:49 I'd hate to think what the difference would be. It could be the difference whether you harvest or not. So yeah, it definitely paid. 68 00:02:57.975 --> 00:02:58.095